Cloud spend is not an IT line item. For a software business it is cost of goods sold, and 25 percent of it may be pure waste. I surface the spend quietly draining your margin, then hand you a prioritized plan to reclaim it.
Fixed scope · two to three weeks · engineered to pay for itself in identified savings
Precisely where the money goes, traced by service, workload, account, and team, and what drives each dollar. The picture your billing console was never built to show you.
Idle and oversized resources, always-on environments, forgone commitment discounts, egress and storage waste, untagged spend, and the architecture and configuration anti-patterns beneath them.
A defensible figure for what is genuinely recoverable, each estimate carrying its own confidence level, so the return is explicit before you commit to anything.
What to address first, ranked by return on effort, and the path to an architecture that stays efficient, scalable, and secure long after the quick wins are banked.
The review pays for itself when there is real spend to recover and real architecture to judge. The strongest engagements tend to share four things.
Enough scale that recoverable waste is measured in real dollars, not rounding.
Where cloud is cost of goods sold and every point of margin is worth defending.
Live environments on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, or Oracle, with architecture worth reviewing.
Cloud cost is everyone's responsibility, which is how it quietly becomes no one's.
Smaller bill, or an estate you already run tightly? I will tell you on the call rather than sell you a review.
Workloads provisioned for peak and left at full size around the clock, dev and staging included, straight through every night and weekend.
Unattached volumes, idle load balancers, orphaned IPs, abandoned environments. Each one small, none of them owned, rarely small in aggregate.
A steady-state baseline billed at full on-demand rates while a 30 to 60 percent commitment discount sits untouched.
Egress, cross-zone chatter, and NAT processing fees that stay invisible until someone thinks to go looking for them.

The rare intersection mid-market teams rarely find in one person: someone who understands cloud architecture deeply, and someone who treats the bill as a margin problem. Certified Solutions Architect who has built / managed enterprise-grade environments across all four major clouds; AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and Oracle Cloud. Chuck helped one enterprise customer cut monthly spend by more than 40 percent, roughly $360,000 in annualized savings; redesigned autoscaling for another to reduce a single workload's compute cost by two thirds; and engineered a storage solution that cut a third customer's cloud storage costs by more than 73 percent.
This is not a tooling problem. A dashboard shows you spend. The value lies in knowing which spend is waste and what is genuinely safe to cut, which is a matter of architecture judgment, not a report.
My work engagement will pay for itself out of the savings it uncovers.
Five places the money goes that never surface as a feature, why no one on the team owns them, and what a review actually recovers. Grounded in current industry data.
Read the teardown ›You walk me through your stack and roughly what you spend. I tell you honestly whether there is enough recoverable waste to justify a review.
If it is a fit, you receive a defined scope, timeline, and price, anchored to the savings on the table. Never an open-ended engagement.
The four deliverables, a defensible savings figure, and a prioritized plan, with a clear path into the remediation work behind it.
A 30 minute call, no obligation. At worst, you leave with a sharper read on exactly where your spend is going.
Thanks — I’ll review your details and reply within one business day to find a time.